Forum Register  Login
 Not Registered! Minimize

To post in this forum you must be a registered user of this site and logged in. This is the only part of the site that is restricted to registered users. If you are not already registered then please register by clicking on register in the top right of this page?

 Print   

 
  Forum  Support  Bugs  Song display uses 100% CPU
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
New Post 4/8/2010 4:40 PM
  stevek_mcc
2 posts
10th Level Poster


Song display uses 100% CPU 

I'm trying to display song text with a video in a background layer, but can't seem to find a PC with enough power. In tests, it seems that displaying just a song takes more CPU than displaying just a video, which surprises me. Task Manager shows nearly 100% CPU for a song; videos are 30-70%. The song shows over 20,000 page faults a second. Results seem the same for Standard or Fast rendered; with WPF the page faults drop to 100 or so, but CPU remains high (and I couldn't display videos).

My current system is a 2.8GHz Celeron with XP SP3 and 3D Blaster FX 5200 with a single display (displaying either to the whole display or 50%). Earlier tests have been on more powerful machines with better graphics cards and a secondary monitor. What would be a reasonable spec for a PC to show a background video and a song, and to change either of them smoothly?

 
New Post 4/8/2010 4:51 PM
  stevek_mcc
2 posts
10th Level Poster


Re: Song display uses 100% CPU 
Modified By stevek_mcc  on 4/9/2010 12:54:48 AM)

Just noticed that setting the song background to a Color rather than None drops CPU usage to 2% and page faults to 10,000 a second. With an Image background CPU is 52% and page faults rise to 33,000 a second. With a black layer 1 and the song with no background in layer 2, CPU is 100% and page faults 20,000.

Sometimes ScreenMonkey seems to throttle the CPU to 50%, but more normally it goes to 100%.

(Sorry for my first post starting with a problem! I really like what I've seen in a few days of playing with ScreenMonkey. You've achieved something quite remarkable here, even if everything's not quite working for me yet)

 
New Post 4/24/2010 8:47 PM
  cicakprints
1 posts
10th Level Poster


Re: Song display uses 100% CPU 

 stevek_mcc wrote

Just noticed that setting the song background to a Color rather than None drops CPU usage to 2% and page faults to 10,000 a second. With an Image background CPU is 52% and page faults rise to 33,000 a second. With a black layer 1 and the song with no background in layer 2, CPU is 100% and page faults 20,000.

Sometimes ScreenMonkey seems to throttle the CPU to 50%, but more normally it goes to 100%.

(Sorry for my first post starting with a problem! I really like what I've seen in a few days of playing with ScreenMonkey. You've achieved something quite remarkable here, even if everything's not quite working for me yet)

 

Hi. I'm facing a similar issue. I notice the CPU usage drops back to normal if the Song Type --> Display Option --> Transition is NOT set to None. As long as one of the transition speed is selected, the 100% CPU issue doesn't appear.

Looks like a software bug to me.

 
New Post 4/27/2010 2:41 AM
  owaits
341 posts
3rd Level Poster


Re: Song display uses 100% CPU 

I notice in the original post you are using XP. The hardware acceleration needed to use transparent backgrounds or images is not present in XP. You need to use either Vista or even better Windows 7.

The high CPU usage is a good indication that the display is being rendered in software. A good graphics card will help the situation. When setup properly the CPU should be around 3%.

 

 

 
Previous Previous
 
Next Next
  Forum  Support  Bugs  Song display uses 100% CPU
Copyright 2005 by Oliver Waits